---
description: >-
  What to check when reviewing a draft from Sitekick AI Studio — structure,
  copy, accuracy, and tone.
title: "Reviewing the AI draft"
canonical_url: https://docs.sitekick.ai/studio/review/reviewing-the-ai-draft
source_url: https://github.com/aketchel/sitekickai_docs/blob/main/sitekick-studio-documentation/review/reviewing-the-ai-draft.md
---

# Reviewing the AI draft

When Studio presents a draft, you are looking for two kinds of feedback: what
is wrong, and what is missing. Both are normal parts of the process.

## What to check on each pass

**Structure first.** Do the pages make sense? Is anything obvious missing?
Is anything there that you do not need? Structural feedback is the most
valuable early feedback, because everything else builds on it.

**Then the copy.** Read each page and ask:

- Is it accurate? Services, service areas, and business details must be
  right.
- Does it sound like you? If the tone is off, say so in your own words.
- Is anything overstated? If the draft claims something your business does
  not do, flag it.

**Then the design.** Does the feel match the brief? You do not need design
vocabulary — "make it calmer" or "this feels too corporate" is enough.

**Finally, the details.** Contact information, links, and anything a
customer would use to reach you.

## You do not have to fix everything at once

It is fine to review in small passes. Point out the biggest thing first;
Studio incorporates that feedback before the next revision. Several focused
rounds usually beat one overwhelming list.

## Accuracy is your job

Studio knows a lot about websites, but only you know your business. Dates,
prices, service areas, licenses, and claims about your work should always be
checked against reality before you publish.

## Next steps

- Learn how to phrase feedback:
  [Requesting changes](requesting-changes.md).